|
发表于 2011-11-2 11:16:18
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 missred07 于 2011-11-2 11:30 编辑
回复 彼岸花w 的帖子
因為帶子沒有不翼而飛
而是警方在當初去MJ家拷貝帶子時 只決定拷貝MJ和CM到家那附近的時間
而檢方在之前四月聽證會的時候也說過 他們去問過 監視錄影帶是motion activated的
MR. WALGREN: VIDEO SURVEILLANCE, AS I INDICATED LAST WEEK AND HAS BEEN CONFIRMED, YOUR HONOR, THE L.A.P.D. DOWNLOADED ABOUT 13, 14, 15 MINUTES OF IT. THAT'S WHAT EXISTS. DEFENSE COUNSEL HAS HAD THAT FOR QUITE SOMETIME. ANY OTHER VIDEO WOULD HAVE BEEN, WOULD HAVE ERASED ITSELF AND BEEN RECORDED OVER. SO ALL THE VIDEO SURVEILLANCE THAT EXISTS IS IN POSSESSION OF THE DEFENDANTS. I WILL POINT OUT, TOO, THAT THE -- AND THIS WILL BE PART OF THE NEW DISCOVERY BECAUSE L.A.P.D. DID FOLLOW UP ON THAT ISSUE. THE VIDEO CAMERAS APPARENTLY WERE SET UP ON THE EXTERIOR ONLY. THEY WERE MEANT TO MONITOR BASICALLY THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY, NOT THE DOORS OF THE PROPERTY, BUT RATHER THE GATES AND THE WALL PERIMETERS AND WERE EXTERIOR ONLY AND THE COVERAGE DEPENDED ON MOTION ACTIVATION AS TO HOW MUCH COVERAGE WAS TAKING PLACE. BUT AGAIN, THAT WILL BE COMMITTED TO A REPORT PROVIDED TO DEFENSE.
|
|