|
|
本帖最后由 bestdaddy 于 2009-7-29 22:14 编辑
Dogfight Shaping Up in Jackson Probate
Posted Jul 29th 2009 9:21AM by TMZ Staff
Katherine Jackson's lawyer is officially squaring off with the two men Michael Jackson selected to handle his estate, claiming the co-executors are intentionally trying to keep Jackson's mom in the dark.
Londell McMillan just issued a statement making it clear -- he wants Katherine to become a co-executor. McMillan claims the co-executors -- John Branca and John McClain -- are not letting Katherine see the agreement Jackson signed with AEG. ... which McMillan says could be a huge source of income for the estate.
McMillan claims the co-executors are imposing unreasonable demands on Katherine -- requiring her to make special promises of confidentiality for the benefit of AEG.
The co-executors have maintained all along they were the ones Michael selected to manage the estate and they are doing their job.
One thing is clear -- it's getting ugly.
凯瑟琳杰克逊的律师正式对MJ选择的两名处理其遗产男子的辩护，声称共同执行人故意试图保持MJ的母亲在黑暗中。
Londell mcmillan刚刚发表了一项声明，明确----他希望凯瑟琳成为共同执行人。mcmillan声明共同遗嘱执行人-约翰布兰卡和约翰麦克莱恩-正在不允许凯瑟琳看到MJ和AEG公司签署的协议。mcmillan说，这可能是遗产中一个巨大的收入来源的产业。
mcmillan声明执行人在对凯瑟琳强加不合理的要求-要求她作出特别承诺对AEG公司的利益保密。
共同遗嘱执行人一直坚持着他们是MJ的选择的那些人 来管理遗产而且他们正在做他们的工作。
有一点是清楚的-它正变得难堪。
--------------------------------------
很多网友认为凯瑟琳受到JOE的压力。
16. If Katherine Jackson feels Michael made a mistake or was not of sound mind when he appointed the 2 lawyers as executors, then I guess it was a mistake to leave her the children and 40% of the estate. She needs to back off and let it go.
Posted at 9:39AM on Jul 29th 2009 by Brooke
17. A friend told me a will dated 2005 was found. I haven't heard anything about it yet.
Any truth to it, TMZ?
Posted at 9:39AM on Jul 29th 2009 by BabyGirl
19. So, the AEG agreement is a cash-cow because they are selling the video of rehearsals, right?
Posted at 9:40AM on Jul 29th 2009 by shuffler
25. Oh no the best was when Joe was interviewed about not being in the will and he said it didn't matter to him because Katherine would be fair. You know he's getting something out of this and makes me and I'm sure alot of others think he's still the driving force for Katherine. Let's face it, they still aren't divorced.
I'm curious though as to why the 2 executors never brought up the whole thing about her losing if she contested the will. Sources say she's not contesting it but if she's trying to change the terms Michal set for who does and gets what, isn't that contesting?
Posted at 9:50AM on Jul 29th 2009 by truthbetold |
|
[复制链接]
狗仔卡
发表于 2009-7-29 21:53:38
变色卡
显身卡
发表于 2009-7-29 22:07:12
楼主
