|
|
发表于 2010-2-13 15:43:56
|
显示全部楼层
continue...................................
And what about divorcing him and still wanting to be with him! You don’t divorce someone and expect to click your fingers and they’ll come running back! What a frivolous attitude to marriage and divorce.
Did Michael ever sl*g her off after she walked out on him? No, he kept a very dignified silence. I am sure he had ALOT to say about her and could have told us all sorts of stories. When she was slating him he must have been dying to open up. Extremely commendable behaviour.
Just after her first Michael bashing interview, Michael’s spokesman released a statement, “as to a comment on anything to do with their marriage, as a gentleman Michael prefers not to respond.” If only Lisa had a shred of Michael’s class and dignity.
She comes out with so much bu*lsh*it on Michael it makes me angry! I hate it when she says (as in I was stupid and naive, the marriage was a huge mistake) “I was very young.” What! as in a 16 year old? Or 20 when she married Keough! Lets get it straight. She was 26 years old when she married Michael. A mother of two. She'd been married for six years previously. That is not the “very young” that she wants us to believe.
The Glenda tapes p*ss all over her trying to say “Michael used me.” In these tapes Michael is heard saying how desperate he was for a REAL relationship. She talks about “timing” and makes out that Michael was only with her because of the allegations. Michael arranged to meet her and was interested in her before the allegations and they were still seeing each other 4 years after the allegations. She actually said herself, "I was already friends with him and there was already romantic stuff going on before that [the allegations] happened." Michael wanted to raise a big family with her. Their relationship was never just a façade for the allegations. As if it was so inconceivable that Michael loved her!
She even said with her mother that Michael was after the Presley name. As if Michael needed the Presley name! Didn’t she realise that Michael was much bigger than Elvis! Michael had overtaken Elvis in nearly every area. He was way better in my opinion. Michael said himself he was never inspired by Elvis. If the name had anything to do with it, it was because Michael wanted the relationship to be REAL. He didn't want to be with someone using him for his name or money. (Glenda tapes)
When asked if Michael loved her she always comes out with, “maybe - as much as he could love anybody” as if Michael was some freak incapable of love. Such evil bu*lsh*t. She said many cruel, contrived things. She acted as if Michael was a complete freak and she was embarrassed, ashamed and mortified that she had been anywhere near him.
When Michael was sick in hospital in ‘95 she turned up screaming and shouting at him and admits she “freaked out.” The doctors wanted her to go and Michael had to ask her to leave. She ought to be ashamed of herself because that sort of behaviour STINKS. She said, “When he got out I called him and said “I want out.” That was nice, telling him she wanted a divorce when he’d just got out of hospital. Way to go Lisa. And she couldn’t even tell him to his face!
And don't get me started on the Oprah interview where she’s sat there with her mother looking and acting like a 15 year old who’s never been interviewed before (she was 37 years old for goodness sake!) Self righteously passing judgement as if they were all holier than thou. Would they have said those things if Michael was there! No way! Oprah asked her what comes to mind when she thinks about being with Michael and Lisa comes out with, "Holy mother of God,” and the whole crowd cheers, claps and laughs and Lisa and Oprah have a good old laugh about it. I was watching it and all of a sudden 'Cult Gathering,' flashed through my mind. Michael deserved so much better. It was just so cruel I felt awful watching it.
It was Lisa who actually set these Michael bashing interviews up. She chose people like Oprah, Diane Sawyer and Howard Stern knowing they were biased against Michael. She knew what questions would come up and the anti-Michael tone these interviews would take. She knew what she wanted to say. When Michael was interviewed he would look at the questions first and delete ones regarding Lisa - he wanted to keep his private life private. Lisa had no right putting Michael’s private life in the public domain. It was a complete invasion of Michael’s privacy.
What I CANNOT comprehend was that the bulk of the bashing was 2003-05 when Michael was going through hell, the worst period of his life. His freedom, career, children, everything - his life was on the line. The last thing he needed at a time like that was her crawling out the woodwork saying "I was naive, he seduced and manipulated me." In short of saying he was guilty, she could hardly have said anything more damaging for a man falsely accused of child molestation.
If what she was saying was the truth, it wouldn’t be nice, but if it was the truth, the truth stands. But everything points to bu*lls*it. In 2003 she launched a PR campaign to rid herself of the perceived "crazy stigma" she felt she had for marrying Michael. She thought she would save face by discrediting the marriage. “Yes I married the weirdo but it wasn’t my fault - I was his victim too.” The poor me act and playing the victim card was complete b*lls*it. The truth was she spent years trying to get Michael back. Her campaign was cowardly, cruel, calculating and unforgivable. In a word it was SICKENING.
She tried many ways and means for “months and months” to get Michael back post divorce: luring him with the promise of “nine children” - that’s manipulative, latching on to his mother and sister, travelling around the world to be with him. On Feb 7 1997 they made headlines when they met for dinner and were pictured holding hands, laughing and kissing before leaving together. Also that year, she went to South Africa with Michael and his mother and was pictured with Michael at an African dance. She travelled hundreds of miles to be with Michael on his History Tour. She was spotted entering his hotel in London as well as going shopping with him hand in hand. There are many post divorce photos of them together.
So much for her being this victim who “got out of it.” Its thanks to women like Lisa playing the victim card when it suits that REAL victims of predative, manipulative men can get doubted.
Then that blog on Michael after he died…the first thing she wrote was “he knew.” Oh pleeeese! Ridiculously trying to make out that Michael had some sort of suicidal death wish and had foreseen his death many years before. Even though she knew absolutely nothing of the circumstances and she had no contact with him in years, she made Michael sound like a hopeless junkie whose death was self-inflicted. The rest of the blog was ultimately about herself and how she wanted to “save him.” Maybe Michael wanted a wife, not someone with “daddy issues” on a mission to “save” him. And what exactly does “save him” mean? I suspect it means “I know best, you do as I say.”
It was wrong how she used Michael’s death to validate why she left him 13 years before he died. If that was the case, I hope I have the compassion to not walk out on someone who’s dying who needs my help, especially someone I supposedly love. But the truth is she wanted him back and got the brush off. Michael had enough of her games and wouldn’t take her back. She had her chance and blew it. Thats something she always fails to mention. It seems to be something she doesn’t want us to know about.
After spending years saying she was used and acting as if Michael was the biggest freak she finally comes clean:
“I am going to say now what I have never said before because I want the truth out there for once. Our relationship was not "a sham,” he loved me and I loved him very much. He was an amazing person and I am lucky to have gotten as close to him as I did and to have had the many experiences and years that we had together.”
I’m glad she said it but for me, it makes her betrayal harder to stomach. Its all well and good saying that now but its too little too late for Michael. That victim crap went on for years. Then the day after his death she says that. What she did on the poor man was SICKENING.
The next time she talks about Michael she wants us all to know how fantastic her new husband is. She took an opportunity to apologise for what she said and turned it into a tribute to her new, fantastic husband who's children she actually did have.
Michael did alot for Lisa. For one he put her on the map. I had never heard of her until Michael married her. Shes interviewed and all anyone wants to know is about Michael. She looked her best when she was with him (really classy), unlike some photos I've seen of her before and after.
Michael set out with the best of intentions with Lisa. He loved her, he married her and he wanted to raise a family with her. Some people seem to think that she was wonderful for him but she gave him far more crap than she ever did love. He didn’t deserve it and it was wrong. |
|
[复制链接]
狗仔卡
显身卡
发表于 2010-2-13 15:42:25
发表于 2010-2-13 15:47:53
