迈克尔杰克逊中文网  - 歌迷论坛

 找回密码
 加入MJJCN

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
楼主: mkgenie

MJCFC新闻工作队注意,在这里接任务

[复制链接]
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-16 14:29:14 | 显示全部楼层
Free Pizza Stalls Jackson Trial The Michael Jackson trial judge was overruled by the jury when they extended their 10-minute snack break because of an unexpected bonanza: free pizza. Judge Rodney Melville has been running an unusually rigid schedule with no lunch hour, just three quick snack breaks during six hours of testimony – a hunger-inducing regimen he calls “the Melville diet.” When jurors took an extra 15 minutes getting back into their seats Tuesday, he offered an explanation. “The Olive Garden heard a CNN report that the jurors were starving to death,” he announced. “So they sent over a bunch of pizzas.” He said the jury “sent out an attack squadron” with word that they wanted time to eat their pizzas. “So now they’re full, and they can thank CNN,” he said.

26

主题

885

帖子

3万

积分

至尊天神

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
31693
发表于 2005-3-16 17:50:43 | 显示全部楼层
164
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-16 20:29:41 | 显示全部楼层
165,166
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-17 10:33:34 | 显示全部楼层
Local lawyer files motion to dismiss Jackson trial Created: Wednesday, 16 March 2005 Redondo Beach attorney files longshot briefs with the state Supreme Court in favor of the pop star. He calls the case an "unjustifiable prosecution." By Denise Nix Daily Breeze A well-known South Bay attorney ventured into the world's biggest criminal case Tuesday by filing briefs with the state Supreme Court on behalf of Michael Jackson that allege the pop star is the target of an overzealous prosecution. The papers filed by attorney Carl A. "Tony" Capozzola ask for an immediate halt to Jackson's ongoing child molestation trial in Santa Maria, now in its third week. Capozzola said in an interview that he was contacted about two months ago by a member of Jackson's legal team, who sought him out after reading about his work on several high-profile cases. Capozzola said he has kept himself and his work for his client quiet until now -- filing his motions with the state's highest court on the same day the alleged 15-year-old victim concluded a four-day stint on the witness stand during which many inconsistencies in his story were explored. "I would like to see the public opinion be acknowledged in the hope -- in the hope -- that the district attorney in Santa Barbara will do the right thing and stop this unjustifiable prosecution," Capozzola said. News accounts about the Jackson trial printed from the Internet are on Capozzola's desk in his Redondo Beach office that overlooks the Pacific Ocean. He shares photographs of himself with the entertainer taken during a visit to Jackson's Neverland Ranch, posing with Oscar statuettes in a room where pictures of Peter Pan and a young Shirley Temple hang on the walls. During that Feb. 13 visit, Capozzola had a talk with Jackson about the case. Then the 46-year-old international star signed a retainer hiring Capozzola to pursue appeals in his malicious prosecution lawsuit against Santa Barbara District Attorney Thomas Sneddon. "I told them before I participated fully in this I would need to speak to Michael personally and be retained on a personal basis," Capozzola said. What he discovered at Jackson's home that doubles as an amusement park and is the scene of the alleged crimes was that Jackson "is a giant kid who wouldn't hurt a kid." "I truly believe that he is a person who loves children, but not in a sexual way," Capozzola said. "But the world of Michael Jackson is different from our world." The father of five added: "I would not have taken this case if I did not firmly believe in the innocence of Michael Jackson and I have never been more confident that he will be exonerated." Capozzola said he has maintained "frequent" contact with Jackson and his trial attorney, Thomas Mesereau Jr., during the trial in Santa Maria. The briefs filed Tuesday claim Sneddon and his office did not give the defense adequate time to review tens of thousands of pages of documents in evidence, did not turn over complete witness lists and has wrongly continued a prosecution based on unverifiable information. Sneddon's involvement in the case is also attacked. Specifically, the papers note that no other district attorneys in the state personally take cases to trial, and add that a prosecutor's personal interest in the case is grounds to disqualify him or her from the proceedings. "The public ridicule of Mr. Jackson by calling him 'Jacko Wacko' is just one of the instances where his personal involvement has crossed the line," Capozzola said about an interview Sneddon gave to Court TV in November 2003. Legal expert Laurie Levenson, a Loyola Law School professor who is following Jackson's trial, said the timing of the Supreme Court filing is no accident and, while the high court is unlikely to act on the request, the maneuver highlights the problems with the prosecution's case. "It's almost impossible to win these motions," Levenson said. "But I don't blame him for trying and it has good PR value." The filing is the next step in a malicious prosecution lawsuit Jackson brought and lost. Capozzola said he expects the court to decide within four or five days if it will review the case. Based on the Supreme Court's action, Capozzola said a decision will then be made about filing a federal lawsuit that would address constitutional issues such as due process and vindictive prosecution. A spokeswoman for the Santa Barbara County District Attorney's Office said a gag order precludes her from commenting on the motion. Jackson is accused of plying the boy, a cancer patient, with alcohol and sexually molesting him. He is also charged with holding the boy and his family captive at his Neverland Ranch in 2003 and forcing them to take part in a documentary in which he proclaims he shares his bed with children, but in an innocent way. The case that brought Capozzola to the attention of Jackson's legal team involved his representation of a couple that took their grandchild from Florida to protect her from alleged child molestation by her stepfather. After 13 years on the run, the girl came forward when she turned 18. With Capozzola's help, the grandparents were able to avoid federal charges. Capozzola's work on behalf of Los Angeles Lakers trainer Gary Vitti in a messy domestic abuse case in which Vitti was acquitted of accusations he strangled his girlfriend also garnered the 45-year bar veteran some positive headlines. [DailyBreeze.com] http://www.dailybreeze.com/news/articles/1372022.html

245

主题

8863

帖子

18万

积分

MJJCN参议员

出淤泥而不染

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
188438

特别贡献奖

发表于 2005-3-17 21:40:22 | 显示全部楼层
169
梦里花落知多少,你爱谈天我爱笑

18

主题

102

帖子

1万

积分

王者传奇

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
10468
QQ
发表于 2005-3-18 18:27:10 | 显示全部楼层

哇!有那么多的资料

我都看不懂啊!虽然我的英语很好的可是那么高难度的东西我还是应付不来拉!

18

主题

102

帖子

1万

积分

王者传奇

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
10468
QQ
发表于 2005-3-18 18:28:40 | 显示全部楼层

有谁知道keen的联系方式啊???

我想知道怎样才能联系到他啊?他真的好厉害啊!我想知道他的qq或者是手机号码!
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-18 18:36:36 | 显示全部楼层
Originally posted by MJ's梦梦 at 2005-3-18 06:28 PM: 我想知道怎样才能联系到他啊?他真的好厉害啊!我想知道他的qq或者是手机号码!
My email: mkgenie@163.com My QQ: 28823822 Would you like to join us?
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-18 21:35:41 | 显示全部楼层
FOX 411 Jackson Accuser's Dean Subpoenaed Friday, March 18, 2005 By Roger Friedman I'm told that Jeffrey Alpert, the former dean of Burroughs Middle School in Los Angeles, has been subpoenaed by the defense in the Michael Jackson case. It came out in court Monday that when the accuser in the case returned to school in March 2003, Alpert interviewed him about his relationship with Jackson. The boy told the dean that nothing had happened, twice. Alpert, who is now at Hollywood High School, will be a key defense witness. He has no ulterior motives or hidden agenda for helping either side, and can give testimony as a witness who has had countless similar conversations with teens the same age as the accuser. During "redirect" this week, the boy testified — employing almost no logic — that he lied to the dean because he'd been harassed by his friends. At some point, the boy may also have to answer a new point that's come up, thanks to The Smoking Gun. The Web site has obtained an interview evaluation of the boy performed by Dr. Stan Katz, the Beverly Hills psychiatrist who was referred the case by attorney Larry Feldman. Feldman and Katz worked together on the 1993 case concerning Jackson. During his interview, the boy in the current case mentioned the name of the boy in the '93 case, which suggests that he knew the details of that case. Interestingly, many of the accusations in the new case parrot the old one almost verbatim. For example, the newer accuser and his mother both complained that Jackson would suddenly like everything the accuser liked, including colors and movies. In the 1993 case, it was charged that the exact same thing occurred. Jackson, who is ordinarily known for his particularity, was said to suddenly like everything that boy preferred as well. A Jackson insider scoffed at this report. "It's the other way around. The kids suddenly want to like everything Michael does," the source said.

190

主题

543

帖子

1万

积分

禁止发言

积分
18497
发表于 2005-3-18 22:38:28 | 显示全部楼层
我来了,这个我的 174楼
…In a world filled with anger
we must still dare to comfort
In a world filled with despair
we must still dare to dream
And in a world filled with distrust
we must still dare to believe…MJ
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-19 00:24:18 | 显示全部楼层
Will Jackson's Past Settlements Come Into Current Case? The judge presiding in the case against Michael Jackson may very well hold hearings on whether or not the prosecution can add in past allegations made against the pop star. The judge had already told the prosecution that he wanted to see if they had a strong case against Mr. Jackson before bringing in the past allegations. The prosecutor's have asked for a hearing on the matter "sooner rather than later? Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville indicated that it may come next week. He told the defense to file a motion in opposition before this Friday. The defense said that they too would want to call in some witnesses. District Attorney Tom Sneddon has put on the accusing family first to get to whether or not he can bring in the 1993-1994 allegations made against Mr. Jackson by two families. The first family ended up filing a civil lawsuit against Mr. Jackson before any criminal proceeding could get under way. The attorneys for Mr. Jackson requested that the civil lawsuit be put on hold until after the criminal trial had taken it's course, but the civil judge denied that motion. Mr. Jackson ended up settling that lawsuit out of court for an estimated $15-20 million. The entertainer maintained his innocence throughout and only settled on negligence. The 搈olestation?accusation made by the family was taken out of the settlement papers. The second lawsuit came from a former maid at Neverland who accused Mr. Jackson of touching her son in 1994. This lawsuit was settled out of court for a reported $2 million dollars. With the current case in shambles because of the current family's inconsistencies and memory loss in their testimony, the district attorney is hoping that the judge will grant him this life-saver by bringing in these past accusations made against Mr. Jackson. "It's crucial," said Laurie Levenson, a professor at Loyola School of Law who is observing the trial. Although California law allows evidence of a defendant's disposition to commit sex crimes to be introduced at trial, the law also leaves the decision up to the judge. The judge could include all, some or none of the evidence, Ms. Levenson said. Whatever the judge decides, both sides are anticipating that at least some of Mr. Jackson's past interaction with boys will be part of the trial. Defense attorneys said the prosecutors want a group of "disgruntled former employees, paid tabloid informants and other disreputable characters" to testify about Mr. Jackson's past. The prosecution needs for Mr. Jackson's past to come into play because they need to counteract the defense's assertion that the current allegations "were fabricated by the victim and his family for financial gain," said Senior Deputy District Attorney Gerald Franklin in a motion filed earlier this year. California's evidence code was changed a decade ago to allow prosecutors to include past crimes and even uncharged allegations of a crime in sex offense cases. "As a matter of logic, the best way to prove that a man is a sex offender is to prove that he has sexually offended again and again," Mr. Franklin said. The only caveats are that such evidence must be relevant and support the prosecution's theory regarding a defendant's intent, motive, opportunity and plan or scheme to commit the charged offense. A Court of Appeal opinion upholding the law said, "The Legislature has determined the need for this evidence is 'critical' given the serious and secretive nature of sex crimes and the often resulting credibility contest at trial." The author of the 1995 legislation, former Assemblyman James Rogan, R-Glendale, a one-time prosecutor and judge, said it was important to include this sort of evidence. The law allows a judge to make a "common sense" assessment of the evidence, and if it is allowed, gives juries a chance to make a rational assessment of the probability or improbability for the defendant to commit such a crime,?Mr. Rogan said. The prosecution is claiming that there are other boys that Mr. Jackson was allegedly involved with around 1993-1994, but once the first accusing family accepted the settlement, the case fell apart. They could not explain, however, why these other alleged victims of Mr. Jackson couldn抰 testify against him in a criminal court without the first family involved. Currently, the prosecution only has the former Neverland maid's son, who is now in his twenties, willing to come forward. It was reported by prosecution insiders that the first boy, also in his twenties, would only take the stand if his testimony was necessary to convict Mr. Jackson. However, other sources have contradicted that notion and said that he is either not a willing participant or he may eventually testify on behalf of Mr. Jackson. MSNBC consultant and a prosecution mouth piece, former Santa Barbara County Sheriff Jim Thomas said that the prosecution wants to use the evidence to show a pattern of behavior. "I think it's very important, because it would show the jury that there's a past pattern and practice," said Mr. Thomas. The more parallels prosecutors can show, the more it bolsters the claims of the current accuser, he said. The focus of the case might also turn from the problems of the accuser and his family to Mr. Jackson. "If it comes in, I think the momentum of the case changes," Mr. Thomas said. "The defense will continue to discredit these witnesses, but the jury at some point might say, 'Wait a minute, all these people can't be lying.'" However, the defense contends that the 1993 case was a blueprint for other potential accusers to come in and say that Mr. Jackson did something to them. Defense attorney Robert Sanger said in court papers that prosecutors have for more than a decade had a sort of "open casting call for witnesses who are willing to make these types of allegations." It has been reported by the Santa Barbara Sheriff's department that the case in 1993 is still active to this day.

23

主题

450

帖子

7623

积分

侠之大者

圝◣☆DD☆◢圝

Rank: 4

积分
7623
发表于 2005-3-19 08:39:53 | 显示全部楼层
176
Sometimes you've got to sacrifice the things you like
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-24 21:00:39 | 显示全部楼层
Macaulay Culkin's Dad Goes to Bat for MJ Wednesday, March 23, 2005 By Roger Friedman Michael Jackson never acted inappropriately with Macaulay Culkin or any of his siblings. So says the Culkins' long-estranged dad, Kit, in a single-spaced, 40-page treatise I read yesterday. Kit Culkin has gotten a bad rap because of his acrimonious divorce from his wife and because of various episodes when he acted as his kids' agent. But Kit, who is the brother of actress Bonnie Bedelia, is not stupid and spent a great deal of time with Jackson in the early 1990s when his kids visited Neverland. Culkin writes that, except for one instance, he had no criticisms of Michael Jackson. Indeed, the piece, which is co-written with his significant other of 10 years, Jeanette Kryoski, is thoughtful and unemotional. "I never saw or heard anything at all during my early days of knowing Michael to suggest that he was a pedophile," Culkin writes. "My kids never slept with Michael. I need mention this because on the [Martin] Bashir program, Michael admitted that he did sleep with children; and well he may have, but he never slept with mine," he continues. "Whenever at Neverland, they always had their own quarters, as did their mother and as did I. Michael's bedroom (an enormous room with a fireplace and French doors leading out to a private garden) was almost always an open place to hang out in, as was most all of the rest of the house. "My children would sit on the bed, as would I, to play cards or checkers or watch television or whatever, but then we would do so most everywhere else also. They might of occasion fall asleep there just as they might of occasion fall asleep most anywhere else, and at most any daylight hour ... "They'd fall asleep watching a movie at the movie theatre or playing with the toys trains in the toy trains room and there was one occasion, I well remember, when one of them was actually found asleep on the carousel! So, as I say, there was nothing in these days to suggest pedophilia." Kit Culkin's statement reads like a treatment for a memoir, but isn't being shopped to anyone right now. Culkin has more to say about Jackson, and lots of other subjects as well. I'll tell you some more about his feelings about Michael tomorrow. But someone in publishing should call this Kit Culkin. He came off as a little nutty in the tabloid press, and I can't vouch for his parenting skills, but he's an insightful writer who got a quite a good inside look at Hollywood.
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-25 08:06:41 | 显示全部楼层
178楼CINDY已接
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-25 21:46:43 | 显示全部楼层
Was There an Unknown Jackson Accuser? Friday, March 25, 2005 By Roger Friedman Was There an Unknown Jackson Accuser? Was there a kid who made a deal with Michael Jackson before the 1993 accuser settled with the pop star for $20 million? Tape recordings left behind by a deceased National Enquirer reporter would suggest there was, but on closer inspection it turns out there probably wasn't. In fact, the tapes show that there was a zealous push on the part of the supermarket tabloids 12 years ago to find any boy who might have been abused by Jackson. This will be a disappointment for Santa Barbara District Attorney Tom Sneddon, who has not been able to produce any other of Jackson's "victims" so far. On Monday, Judge Rodney Melville will conduct a hearing in that will determine whether or not Jackson's "prior" acts can be brought into this trial. If they are allowed, what could they be and where did they come from? And are they real? If he has to prove his case, Sneddon is prepared to bring back every ex-Jackson employee and every cops whom worked on the 1993 Chandler case — even if they've sold their stories to the tabloids. The result could be a veritable index of the supermarket tabs' sources and leakers from a dozen years ago. Enquirer and Globe writer Jim Mitteager, like a tabloid Richard Nixon, taped most of his conversations about Jackson when he covered the story in 1993-94. Mitteager, who was dismissed from the papers for sexual harassment, talks to his sources and his editors very candidly. The result is a revealing look at how the tabs salivated to get the most salacious story about Michael Jackson, often disregarding the exact truth for kernels of plausible items that could be inflated into screaming front-page headlines. Mitteager bequeathed the tapes to Paul Barresi, a self-styled investigator. Barresi says Mitteager trusted him to "do the right thing with them." Barresi thought the tapes had value, but could not have guessed what historical importance they would have. Mitteager inadvertently kept a record of much of what is in the news today concerning the underbelly of Hollywood. The tapes include anecdotes about many celebrities and lawyers as well as incarcerated private eye Anthony Pellicano, who once worked for Jackson. Barresi had a long history with the Jackson story. In 1993, the pop star's former cook and housekeeper, Philip and Stella LeMarque, asked him to sell their story about sexual abuse at Neverland. The LeMarques, who were slight acquaintances of Barresi, had only worked at Neverland for about 10 months and ended after the Chandler case broke. Like many disgruntled former employees, the LeMarques are now on the prosecution's witness list. Another couple that also sold their story, the Quindoys, are ready to testify as well. But Barresi realized the LeMarques were probably not telling the truth early on. "I concluded that it was all about the money and not about protecting a child from a predator," he told me. The couple, he said, began embellishing their story when they thought they could get $500,000 for it. In the end, they received nothing. Barresi wound up turning over his taped interviews with the couple to Los Angeles District Attorney Gil Garcetti. They are now in the hands of Jackson's prosecutor. The coup de grace, Barresi says, happened later when he listened to Mitteager's tapes. On one of them it's noted that the LeMarques had tried to sell their story long before the Chandler case in 1991. "They couldn't get any takers," recalls Barresi. "But why didn't they just go to the police?" Often the Globe printed stories from Mitteager based on the flimsiest evidence. Mitteager, at least in the case of Jackson, relied heavily on a sketchy stringer named Taylea Shea. Her veracity consequently became integral to a lot of tabloid reporting at the time. Shea, who seems to have a number of aliases and a long list of addresses and phone numbers, could not be contacted for this story despite many tries. Neighbors at her longest-lived Los Angeles address do not remember her fondly. They recall a hustler and con woman who was always on the take. "She should be in jail if she hasn't been already," one former friend and neighbor said. On one tape, Shea reads what sounds convincingly like a legal document drawn up between Michael Jackson and a 12-year-old boy named Brandon P. Richmond, who is represented by his mother, Eva Richmond. Brandon, according to the document, received $600,000 from Jackson. He and Jackson would no longer have any contact with each other. Shea read the document, which is dated July 1992, to Mitteager in 1993. This would have been a blockbuster if true because it would make Brandon, not the boy from the 1993 case, the first of Jackson's accusers. Shea also says on the tape that the document is from the law offices of Bert Fields, who was Jackson's attorney at the time. No reason is given, though, why Jackson and Brandon Richmond should be parted. The implication, however, is clear. The Globe published the story without using names. Over time, it was assumed that Brandon P. Richmond was in fact Brandon Adams, the boy who had appeared in Jackson's "Moonwalker" video. Discussions on the tapes indicate that the tabloids believed the two Brandons were one in the same. But looking into the situation now shows there's a problem with Shea's story: Nothing adds up. For one thing, a source close to Fields says the document uses language uncommon to their usual agreements. And then there's the actual family: According to the Adamses, whom I met in January, they don't know an Eva Richmond. Brandon Adams's mother is named Marquita Woods. And Brandon's grandmother assures me she knows nothing of a $600,000 payment. The family has lived in a modest home in Baldwin Hills, Calif., for 30 years. Brandon Adams, who is now 25, is a struggling actor. He appeared in "Mighty Ducks 2," the indie film "MacArthur Park" and is currently working on building a music career. "I wish I had $600,000," he said. "I'm broke." The Adamses pointed out that Brandon never visited Neverland, just the Jackson family home in Encino. For a short time they were friendly not only with the Jacksons, but with Sean Lennon and his mother Yoko Ono, who were also part of "Moonwalker." But the relationship seems to have ended well before Taylea Shea's big scoop. Was Shea simply lying to Mitteager to collect a big fee? It would seem so. On the tapes, Mitteager tells an editor that Shea also has "shocking" material about David Geffen and Keanu Reeves, among others. None of it would turn out to be true, but all of it was tabloid fodder that spread to some more mainstream publications for a short time. Curiously, nobody I spoke with who worked at the tabloids could remember Taylea Shea. And her own alleged main source — an attorney then associated with the office of Larry Feldman, the Chandlers' lawyer — insists vehemently that she did not know Shea and had little knowledge of the case anyway. Suddenly, the value of the Mitteager tapes takes on a new meaning. Barresi, a sometime investigator and tabloid source in the past, is aware that he's in possession of materials that demonstrate how the supermarket tabloids operated in their heyday: the era of O.J. Simpson, Jackson and other scandals. But one tabloid editor still in the business cautioned, "Don't paint all of us with the same brush. We did a lot of excellent work on Simpson." Indeed, though it's hard to separate them in our minds, the Globe — under a different owner — had a much lower standard than the Enquirer in the early 1990s. And Mitteager, came from that mentality, according to sources with whom I have spoken. At one point, in running down lists of kids who'd spent time with Jackson, Mitteager rattles off the name of a boy with the conviction that Jackson, who had befriended him, must have also acted inappropriately with him. But it was only wishful thinking on the part of a tabloid reporter. It turns out, that the boy was 9 years old in 1993 and died shortly thereafter from leukemia. He'd met Jackson through the Make a Wish Foundation. Even Jackson's staunchest critics would agree that it is hard to fathom how this boy could have been the object of the singer’s romantic interests.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 加入MJJCN

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|迈克尔杰克逊中文网(Michael Jackson Chinese Fanclub)[官方认证歌迷站] ( 桂ICP备18010620号-7 )

GMT+8, 2024-11-15 07:18

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表