迈克尔杰克逊中文网  - 歌迷论坛

 找回密码
 加入MJJCN

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
楼主: mkgenie

MJCFC新闻工作队注意,在这里接任务

[复制链接]

3

主题

64

帖子

1万

积分

王者传奇

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
14691
QQ
发表于 2005-2-9 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
58楼[em27]
僻静的小路,狭仄而又险峻;
他知道,生于普遍性之外,
在行走时碰不到一个旅行者,是十分可怕的。

3

主题

64

帖子

1万

积分

王者传奇

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
14691
QQ
发表于 2005-2-9 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
继续~~60楼[em01][em01]
僻静的小路,狭仄而又险峻;
他知道,生于普遍性之外,
在行走时碰不到一个旅行者,是十分可怕的。
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-10 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
XUE XUE是劳动模范啊,年终奖要多发点`````````[em01][em01]

136

主题

4881

帖子

11万

积分

超级版主

Professor of Chronic Suicide

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10

积分
110897

普里策新闻奖特别贡献奖

QQ
发表于 2005-2-10 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
汗....都被认领了么?... 好不容易有时间了...^^~等待上级发偶关于新闻报的任务,让偶尽一下绵力~ 呵呵..^^
I'll Never Let You Part, For You're Always In My Heart.

3

主题

64

帖子

1万

积分

王者传奇

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
14691
QQ
发表于 2005-2-10 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
这可是keen说的哦,到时可不许赖帐哈 大家都听到的!!啦啦~~ [em31]
僻静的小路,狭仄而又险峻;
他知道,生于普遍性之外,
在行走时碰不到一个旅行者,是十分可怕的。

33

主题

3268

帖子

5万

积分

圣殿骑士

守护他一辈子

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

积分
54717
QQ
发表于 2005-2-10 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
老是抢不到 下一个是我的哈
无时无刻的想念
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-10 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
Most jurors very familiar with the case By Quintin Cushner/Staff Writer The average juror in the Michael Jackson child molestation case is a 45-year-old working woman from Santa Maria, married with children, who has seen media reports about the proceeding and has discussed it with friends. Questionnaires completed by about 240 jurors eligible for the Jackson trial were released Wednesday by the Santa Barbara County Superior Court. The eight-page form quizzed jurors on their life experiences and their familiarity with the case and famous defendant. Members of the jury pool range from 18 to 81 years of age, and they have lived an average of 22 years in Santa Barbara County. Women account for 55 percent of the pool, and men for 45 percent. The majority - about 74 percent - are employed at least part-time, with only about 14 percent listing themselves as retired. About 38 percent claimed a college degree, with the rest entering adulthood with a high school diploma, or in several cases less. A surprising number - 34 percent - either have been arrested or know someone who has. Alternately, about 14 percent said they or someone close to them had been a victim or witness to a serious crime. Seven percent admitted that they, a family member, or friend had been accused of inappropriate sexual behavior, while about 14 percent acknowledged being or knowing a victim of such misconduct. About 43 percent know a law enforcement officer, and almost all listed themselves or a close relative as a military veteran. A large number of jurors were either educators or retail workers, while others were engineers, bookkeepers and janitors. Most jurors were from either Santa Maria or Lompoc, while a substantial number were Jackson's neighbors in the Santa Ynez Valley. Less-populated areas such as Ballard and Cuyama were also listed as hometowns. The questionnaires are used as tools by attorneys and the judge to discover what jurors know about a case, and to screen them for potential bias. Judging by responses on the questionnaire, most jurors know more about this case than they've been told in court. A huge majority, 70 percent of the panelists, said they knew "a little" about the case from media reports, while 19 percent said they knew "a lot." Also, 66 percent of panelists said they had discussed the case with friends or family. In addition, just over 60 percent had heard about a previous sexual-abuse investigation against Jackson conducted in 1993. Prosecutors may want to examine the opinions of the quarter of jurors who said they or someone they knew had either met Michael Jackson or spent time at Jackson's Neverland Valley Ranch near Los Olivos. "I went to Neverland w/ special ed for my sch. dist," wrote Juror No. 10, a local teacher. "My disabled daughter was allow to go to Neverland, but Mr. Jackson was not present during her school visit," wrote Juror No. 243, a risk analyst from Santa Maria. No. 194, a 47-year-old Solvang woman, said her son works at the ranch and another son, 15, had gone to the ranch with a friend of Jackson "to ride and hang out." And 7 percent said they, a family member, or friend knew Jackson. Juror No. 54, a 48-year-old pastor from Lompoc, said Jackson's cousin is in his church and a Jackson employee "is my son's best friend." A 43-year-old Buellton woman answered in detail about whether she or any of her family or close friends knew Jackson: "My niece-in-law's sister has dated Ely, Michael's cousin, and we have attended family functions with Ely." Defense attorneys may wish to scrutinize the 15 percent of jurors who said they had worked with groups interested in "child safety, child abuse or mistreatment, or children's rights." One 38-year-old Guadalupe woman said that as a preschool teacher, she is a "mandated reporter," meaning the law requires her to report any suspicions that a child has been abused. The woman has four children, including a 10-year-old boy and a 13-year-old girl. No. 40, a 38-year-old physical education teacher from Lompoc who said he had either met Jackson or spent time at his ranch, said it would be "nearly impossible" for him to be impartial. "Having 3 children of my own, I am very sensitive to any type of child abuse. The actions that Mr. Jackson has admitted to with children are very disturbing to me," he wrote. Most jurors said English was their first language. Other languages listed included Spanish, Korean and Tagalog, which is spoken in the Philippines. Jury selection in the Jackson case resumes Monday, when attorneys will question the panel in person, and have an opportunity to dismiss jurors they believe might hurt their cause. Twelve jurors will sit at Jackson's trial, along with eight alternates. Jackson is on trial for four counts of engaging in lewd acts with a 13-year-old boy and four counts of administering alcohol to help him with the alleged molestations. He has pleaded not guilty to those charges as well as to a count of attempted child molestation and a conspiracy charge involving child abduction, false imprisonment and extortion.
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-10 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
Appeals court weighs Jackson case secrecy VENTURA, Calif. (AP) — An appeals court considering whether to lift some of the secrecy in the Michael Jackson case questioned lawyers Wednesday about how to balance Jackson's right to a fair trial with the public's right to know. Questions from the three-judge panel of the state's 2nd District Court of Appeal focused on whether releasing details of a criminal case involving a high-profile defendant could poison the jury pool, and on how to release some information while withholding such details as the name of the accuser, who is a minor. Jackson is accused of molesting a 13-year-old former cancer patient. Key documents in the case that have not been released include a November 2003 search warrant for Jackson's Neverland ranch, transcripts of the grand jury proceedings that led to his indictment, and the indictment itself. Santa Barbara Superior Court Judge Rodney S. Melville has said he is keeping some information secret to avoid influencing prospective jurors and to ensure Jackson a fair trial. He said he will release the indictment and grand jury transcripts once a jury is seated, which is expected to take several weeks. During questioning, Associate Justice Arthur Gilbert noted that any information about Jackson would reach people in Santa Barbara County and beyond. "If he clears his throat, it's going to make the front page of the Karachi Times," Gilbert said. Justice Steven Z. Perren said at one point that Melville had tried "heroically, I think" to balance the release of documents with Jackson's right to a fair trial. Attorney Theodore J. Boutrous, representing The Associated Press and other news outlets, said close screening of prospective jurors would ensure that no one with strong biases would make the jury. Attorneys are scheduled to begin questioning prospective jurors Monday. Boutrous said the public had a right to follow the allegations and Jackson's responses to them in order to gauge whether prosecutors and defense attorneys were acting properly and making well-grounded arguments. He said the obligation to release information was especially high in cases with intense public interest. Gilbert asked if Boutrous could imagine a case in which the allegations were "so lurid and so gory that just repeating those could create revulsion" among potential jurors. Gilbert also pressed attorneys for Jackson and for Santa Barbara County, noting that "in 99 and nine-tenths of the cases, including lurid cases, everything is open to the public." Robert Sanger, an attorney for Jackson, said the singer didn't want special treatment, but was entitled to a fair trial. Sanger said he was worried about the jury pool being contaminated. The appeals panel did not say when it will rule. Melville could opt to release documents in the case before the appeals court decision, if jury selection is completed quickly enough. Jackson, 46, is also charged with giving the boy alcohol and conspiring to hold him and his family captive. The pop star has pleaded not guilty. Questionnaires filled out by 242 potential jurors that were released Wednesday showed some have children who've visited Neverland ranch. A scribbled comment by one said: "My disabled daughter was allow to go to Neverland, but Mr. Jackson was not present during her school visit." Another potential juror said her son works at the ranch and another son, 15, had gone to the ranch with a friend of Jackson's "to ride and hang out." On another question, 67 people, or more than one in four of the respondents, said they knew someone who has met Jackson or spent time at his ranch. The vast majority of the prospects said neither their feelings nor experiences with people from different races would affect their ability to serve. Nine said their sentiments and experiences would affect their judgment, and seven were not sure.
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-10 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
Commentary: Questioning authority: Should trial info be kept secret? Ted Boutrous rose, approached the podium and argued on behalf of freedom. The 44-year-old Los Angeles attorney, who represents some of the most powerful media outlets in the nation, appeared Wednesday in the state's 2nd District Court of Appeal in Ventura. Boutrous asked the panel of three judges to overturn Santa Barbara County Superior Court Judge Rodney Melville's decision to seal most of the court documents in the Michael Jackson child-molestation case. In any other case, these documents likely would be released. But because of Melville's paranoia that the jury pool could be poisoned with information, the jurist has cracked down on the public's right to know and ordered that most official records be kept secret. Associate Justice Arthur Gilbert cut right to the chase. "We don't live in a vacuum," the judge told Boutrous. "Word has it that the information you want is out there." Gilbert wanted to know if that fact made the appellate court proceeding "academic." Boutrous politely disagreed. Of course documents relating to the case have been leaked. But many more documents crucial for the public to understand the case remain secret. Melville has released some information. And he promised to release more. Even as Boutrous spoke, reporters from all over the world were looking at jury questionnaires that Melville ordered be released yesterday. But questionnaires, heavily edited documents and promises aren't enough. Gilbert asked Boutrous if any difference exists between a civil case and a criminal case. "Where someone's freedom is at stake," the judge said. No difference when it comes to pertinent information about a case, Boutrous said. Gilbert seemed impressed. Boutrous was doing well. The judge then acknowledged Jackson's immense fame. "If he clears his throat, it's going to make the front page of the Karachi Times," Gilbert said. Boutrous said the public still needs to know what's going on in court. "That's when the public should be able to watch the official proceedings and view the official documents," Boutrous said. The judge asked question after question and seemed genuinely interested in the major implications of the issue. Boutrous even acknowledged that some circumstances warrant the sealing of some court documents. But only rarely, he said. And with good cause. What about a "grisly murder?" Gilbert asked. "I don't think so," Boutrous said. Then Boutrous got back to the 46-year-old celebrity defendant. "Because Mr. Jackson's famous, his indictment is secret," he said. Justice Steven Perren then cleared his own throat. "I don't care about Karachi," he said of the city in Pakistan. "I care about Santa Barbara County." Perren also seemed miffed that Boutrous had the gall to question judicial decisions that individual judges might make in the course of any day. Can't a judge just use "common sense?" Perren asked. The public knows what's going on in the Jackson case, Perren said. Boutrous didn't say what he must have been thinking. No, they don't know. That's the whole point. The discussion remained lively as Boutrous and the two judges continued to go back and forth. Justice Paul Coffee sat silent for the entire proceeding. "How far can the one (First Amendment) be vindicated before the sixth (amendment) is compromised?" Perren asked. Everybody wins when the justice system rises to the challenge and opens, rather than closes, government, Boutrous said. In California courts, everything is presented on the record. Only in rare circumstances are documents sealed, he said. All three judges seemed to listen closely. Boutrous had their attention. Secrecy does little to build "public respect for the justice system," Boutrous argued. Even the accused benefits from openness. Since leaks will inevitably occur, it's best that the information comes from official sources. The judges thanked Boutrous for his time and he thanked them for theirs. Now the court will decide. And one day we will discover if these three judges believe in freedom with the same spirit that Ted Boutrous does.

3

主题

64

帖子

1万

积分

王者传奇

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
14691
QQ
发表于 2005-2-10 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
68楼[em01]
僻静的小路,狭仄而又险峻;
他知道,生于普遍性之外,
在行走时碰不到一个旅行者,是十分可怕的。
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-10 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
劳模,先给你发朵 [em23]

136

主题

4881

帖子

11万

积分

超级版主

Professor of Chronic Suicide

Rank: 10Rank: 10Rank: 10

积分
110897

普里策新闻奖特别贡献奖

QQ
发表于 2005-2-10 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
69~ - -+
I'll Never Let You Part, For You're Always In My Heart.

3

主题

64

帖子

1万

积分

王者传奇

Rank: 7Rank: 7Rank: 7

积分
14691
QQ
发表于 2005-2-10 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
以下是引用mkgenie在2005-2-10 17:52:27的发言: 劳模,先给你发朵 [em23] 没什么,现在正好放假 等到开学就没时间了 [em06]
僻静的小路,狭仄而又险峻;
他知道,生于普遍性之外,
在行走时碰不到一个旅行者,是十分可怕的。

33

主题

3268

帖子

5万

积分

圣殿骑士

守护他一辈子

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

积分
54717
QQ
发表于 2005-2-12 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
我又来预定了哈下一篇是我的
无时无刻的想念
mkgenie 该用户已被删除
 楼主| 发表于 2005-2-12 00:00:00 | 显示全部楼层
Abrams Report (Feb 11 2005) Paul Pfingst, Former San Diego District Attorney: If I were Tom Sneddon I would run, not walk, away from this witness because the opportunity for the defense to cross-examine him and to make him look silly and therefore diminish the rest of the prosecution's case, is just so great -- I'm gonna be surprised, I'm gonna be shocked if the prosecutors put him on the stand. He has been on television so many times saying so many good things about Michael Jackson that any jury is likely to think that is he trying to revive his acting career and get the attention he wasn't getting before? And so I think he's a worthless witness.____________________________________________________________________Abrams: "…closest he ever came to touching me was slapping me on the leg once". I mean, I've gotta believe, Ron, I -- I guess he's subpoenaed. I guess it sounds like the might call him. But boy would I be shocked if they actually try. Ron Richards, Defense attorney: Well yeah, I mean this has bee the week though for very old double digit allegations as you well know. So nothing surprises me. The subpoena came after he shot the telecast about a week ago, so. The judge hasn't even let in things that are after 1993 it would be almost not believable that he's going to let in things from the early 80s.Abrams: And it sounds like, and I'm gonna play another piece of sound here from his interview with ABC news, but it sure sounds like, even when you listen to exactly what he's saying, he's still not ready to offer particularly incriminating testimony against Jackson.Abrams: You know, so Paul, what is he gonna say that's gonna be so incriminating? That Michael Jackson has a book of nude people and had stuff about sexually transmitted diseases?Pfingst: You know if he gets up on the stand and says something like he just said, 'You don't understand the toll of defending Michael Jackson', he's gonna look like a fool. Because the fact of the matter is that most people think hanging out with superstars is not a toll, and you could have walked away any time you wanted to. One of the dangers that sometimes could happen with prosecutors is you try to put little pieces together and make a big piece. But one of the things you have to worry about is that if one of your little pieces blows up, it blows up some of your bigger pieces with it. So I can't foresee any circumstances where a prosecutor could be so desperate as to try to put someone on the stand and allow the defense a field day in cross-examination. Dan, I just can't see it. Abrams: Ron, he's more of what Corey Feldman says now. (quotes from ABC News article) You know, so what? Richards: Yeah, I mean - look all children grow up. And the fact is that Corey Feldman hasn't really had anything that's newsworthy in a very long time. And it's a very powerful motive for someone to get free publicity on 20/20 tonight in primetime. This is more…Abrams: This isn't gonna help his career though, Ron. The bottom line is this is not going to help his career. Coming out in publicly and talking about Michael Jackson, i can't imagine is going to lead Hollywood to suddenly say, oh, that's the guy i want starring in my next movie.Richards: Well it's creating a buzz.Pfingst: Well, he may think so, Dan.Abrams: What, Paul?Pfingst: He may think so.Richards: Dan, in Hollywood you sell the sizzle, not the steak. Just remember that. Abrams: Yeah.Richards: This is the land where people self-promote. And we're not in the first period here. Corey Feldman is in the fourth period with two minutes to go in the game, there's nothing wrong with him throwing a "hail mary" and juxtaposing himself in the middle of the trial now.Pfingst: Kato Kaeland (sp?) did a good job, Dan. (laughter) He stayed alive for a while. Abrams: Yeah.Richards: I've never agreed so much with a prosecutor in one show in my whole life. I just want say I agree with everything my colleague is saying today.Abrams: Yeah, no. Look I mean I think that it's hard to argue that this testimony A) is gonna be admissible. I mean first of all as a legal matter, Paul -- and I'm almost out of time here -- but he would have to have committed a sexual offense on Corey Feldman, right? I mean he would have had to break the law in order for his [Feldman's] testimony to be admissible.Pfingst: Yeah the prosecutor would have to show that there was some commonality between what he did with Corey Feldman and what he did with the boy involved in the accusations here. And clearly any commonality is so remote -- there's not touching, no fondling, no sexual acts and so on. So I think it's dead. I'm surprised, frankly, I'm very surprised that this man would even get a subpoena. Richards: It could be a flashback from the heroin usage.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 加入MJJCN

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|迈克尔杰克逊中文网(Michael Jackson Chinese Fanclub)[官方认证歌迷站] ( 桂ICP备18010620号-7 )

GMT+8, 2025-4-3 10:24

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

© 2001-2017 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表