我只想说一个简单的道理

whoisit

dy2clamp 发表于 2010-12-3 21:13
LZ亲自请求

大家一起来，前一段遗产公司不是就顶不住歌迷压力，勉强透露出有James Porte作为背景和声

帅帅天使迈

我也一直持这样的观点，到目前为止所谓的证明都限于加工后的版本，歌迷也只能听到加工后的版本。
很多声明中并没有说请人检验的是原demo,而一直在强调主音，这不是解决问题的关键。
但是想让我们听到原demo的可能性太小了...搞不好都销毁了也有可能

飞扬清婉

我也一直希望听到未经后期加工的原始录音素材。

不管怎样，觉得这些歌都有CASIO与那个JAMES PORTE参与有些奇怪。

MJ并不常与其他人以这样的方式合作。如果说合作了12首歌都是这样，那就更奇怪了。

晓涵

样带表示鸭梨很大

晓涵

样带表示鸭梨很大

君子兰442

就算公布了，不相信的也会有各种理由不相信，要我是遗产公司和SONY，我就不公布，省的最后还落个越抹越黑。具有法律效力的正式声明都不管用，反被质疑的更多不就说明问题了吗？原始样带也会被怀疑造假，干吗要公布？以后发任何一首MJ的未完成作品都有可能遇到同样问题，难道要一个一个的声明再公布原始样带吗？想想都没可能，这个真假的问题基本上是无解的。

Jasmine-love-MJ

谈何容易啊～

回复 whoisit 的帖子

科学鉴定我从没怀疑过，卡西欧拿MJ不完整的demo去接受鉴定，当然是真的MJ的声音
就像一瓶百年葡萄酒，你请顶级鉴定家鉴定当然是真酒，但鉴定专家一走你就一比一地兑水，我虽不是什么鉴定专家，真葡萄酒和假葡萄酒还是区别地出来

就你们这种思维，卡西欧家族是永远也说不清了！欲加之罪，何患无辞！
可惜这件事情不是你们说了算！！

对了，为什么不回答我杰克逊家族不走法律途径的事儿？这才是问题的关键！

stroller

同样对demo感到好奇。。。

晖弟弟

DEMO估计会收录在下一个精选碟里面把？哈哈

Selina1995

我就没怀疑过歌的真假。。

乱世佳人

Korgnex


That's simply. The other tracks are typical studio recordings that Michael put his soul into, their production is superb and the songs are finished.

"We all want to believe it"? Okay, I assume you maybe want it, yes.

But from what "damien" or "tristan" & others are writing, I would say: No, they don't want it to be Michael. They don't like what Teddy Riley, Neff-U etc. have made with the songs, they don't like the production, they call it crappy. And they think the inserted ad-libs from older tracks would be a sign of fake, but it's a sign of fragmentariness.

They don't want to accept that Michael can be imperfect and they deny the existence of rough recordings that were done with the Cascios. They think it's fake because earlier demos or "Hold My Hand" don't sound like this. That's right, but they forgot about how these vocals were recorded.


I can understand their doubts though. But what I CANNOT understand is that they really want to associate these recordings with Jason Malachi.
They're saying they have listened to every song by Jason and still they can't distinguish between rough vocal takes (Cascio tracks) by MJ that have been heavily overworked for inclusion on "Michael" and the songs by Jason.

With all respect, the association with Malachi is the biggest BS ever claimed by fans. It's the only thing why I'm getting emotionally about the whole situation sometimes. I personally don't want to read anything more about the Jason guy.

Not only have I informed about him some years ago to stop the false tagging on youTube & Co., now I have to cope with the situation that some fans really think Sony, the MJ Estate and/or the Cascios would cooperate with this little underground "star" that is only known on some MJ forums.


Well, that's my take on this issue as an audio expert. Some (yeah, a few people) are saying I would have lost my credibility.
I would say I have retained and ensured my professional objectivity.

janeqing

这个作者是谁?

乱世佳人

I can easily say that about the Jacksons because they are in a different ballpark. They don't need to make a consumer fraud claim. Katherine and the kids are the beneficiary of the estate, 3T are the contingent beneficiaries, they could have gone to the probate court and stop/delay etc the album. Remember when Taj went to court and spoke against the memorabilia tour saying that he didn't think it's not best for his uncle's legacy. remember when they said in court that they weren't happy with the rushed release date of TII as it could sacrifice quality. Remember how Joe tried to remove executors claiming fraud on their part. Where's the similar for the album? Twitter is not the place to fight your battles.

As far as for fans I'm waiting but I'm not holding my breath.

forever_show

认同作者的绝大多数观点。